Alright. So after a day of toiling on the Corythosaur
(well technically evening, spent the day with R doing chores), I've got him to the best that my current strong 3Ding skills can conjure. While I feel he is looking pretty good, there is still a long way to go before perfection (and I plan on really pushing myself this time).
Here he is compared to one of my anatomical references.
Yes, that IS a Gregory Paul I am using. My reasoning, unlike how Mr. Paul played it in his insane rants
, is I have in fact paid the man for the use of his skeletals
, and use them in any way I deem fit. I purchased 5 of his books solely to acquire his material as references, and last time I checked buying something is indeed a form of "compensation". If the idiot didn't want me looking at or using his skeletals
than he shouldn't have bloody well been SELLING them to me in the first place!!!
So yes Mr. Paul I am referencing your skeletals
, and if you don't like go F%$* yourself! I bought it from you for the price you put it out there for fair and square! Had I broken into your house and stolen them, or even gotten the books out of the library that would be one thing (assuming you can copyright a reference in the first place, you crazy @$$), but I owe these books. So I can do whatever I damn well please with them (so long as I'm not DIRECTLY profiting
off your work, which anyone sane person can see I am not. My stuff other than being a Dinosaur isn't the same as your own).
Ah there that feels much better. Sorry about that aside. I needed to stick on to the man. No disrespect to my fellow ART Evolved member Zach for his "No Gregory Paul skeletals were referenced for the production this illustration" meme
, but I just can't accept giving into the bullying of a man who I paid for the reference material he was selling to me...
So you'll notice right away I customized
Mr. Paul's skeletals as per my usual procedure
. I feel it meets the general proportions and parameters
of a Corythosaur
quite nicely. Especially given how much variation and diversity has been found within the genius.
Here he is from all the key angles. Feedback on general proportions and anatomy would be appreciated.
Areas I know need work are the face around the eye, the shoulder to arm attachment, and the tips of the beak.
Here he is from a few more angled points of view.
As per some of Matt van Rooijen
's suggestions I've revisited the eyeball itself. I'm not sure if I like it this emphasised or not, but believe it or not that colour is directly inspired by an elephant's
There has been a number of criticisms
about my scaling approach. I will probably try to test a more realistic version of scales tomorrow (which really just require the scales to be smaller), but one of my interested palaeontologists was specifically after my "non-realistic style". So I'm going to leave this particular shader
in the running, till I get feedback from the intended recipient
I have one quick question for those out there in the know.
While many artists in modern times (and Charles Knight) seem to restore Hadrosaurs
with dorsal ornamentation
such as a fin of soft tissue or knob like projections is there actual evidence for this? Looking through available
photographs of Edmontosaur
mummies and Dinosaur Park Duckbills with skin impressions, I have not found a single reliable example of anything coming off the back. Am I missing something in the Brachylophosaur
mummies (which I haven't found any useful references for) or is there a difference between Lambeosaurines
? As far as I can tell Corythosaurus would have had nothing coming off its back